(Working on timeline of events)
(Attached: Screenshots of 3+2of the May emails as evidence for 👇🏼)
(Sample)Letter to Attorney: (too long??)
I am writing to seek your legal expertise and representation in a matter involving the Alameda County Resource Conservation District (ACRCD) and certain individuals associated with the management of Sunol AgPark.
After obtaining parts of the CPRA report from ACRCD for the year 2023, I have come across information that raises serious legal concerns.
From the internal emails dated April and May 2023, it appears that a case against my farming practices was systematically constructed by Agpark Manager Colleen Hotchkiss, with input from advisory board members and others.
This case, I believe, is based on past incidents and personal vendettas rather than the merits of my performance under the current year-to-year contract, which began on January 1, 2023.
The key legal concerns arising from this situation include:
1. Collusion and Conspiracy: Coordinated efforts by Colleen Hotchkiss and others, including Sri Sethuratnam and Jim Leap, to build a case against me based on past interactions.
2. Retaliation: Actions taken against me seem to be in response to past disputes, indicating possible retaliation.
3. Breach of Contract: Potential violation of the terms of my current contract based on invalid allegations.
4. Defamation: Spreading false or misleading information about my farming practices.
5. Tortious Interference: Intentional disruption of my farming operations and contractual relationship with ACRCD.
6. Abuse of Power/Authority: Misuse of authority by individuals in positions of power at ACRCD and the advisory board.
---
**Issue of Discrimination on the Basis of Disability**
An additional legal concern that has arisen in my situation with the Alameda County Resource Conservation District (ACRCD) and Sunol AgPark management involves what appears to be discrimination on the basis of disability.
This issue is distinct yet connected to the broader context of my experience at the AgPark.
During a period when I was under medical care, my disability or medical condition seems to have been used as a pretext in the crafting of a letter of violation against me.
Such actions potentially constitute discrimination on the basis of disability, which is prohibited under various laws, including the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in the United States.
This aspect of my case involves the unfair treatment I received due to my health status, which not only affected my ability to perform certain farming duties but also appears to have been a factor in the decision-making process leading to the allegations of non-compliance.
This discriminatory practice, if substantiated, represents a significant violation of my rights as an individual with a disability.
I believe this issue warrants separate attention and legal consideration, as it involves fundamental rights and protections afforded to individuals with disabilities.
It also speaks to the ethical and legal responsibilities of organizations like ACRCD to accommodate and not discriminate against persons based on their health conditions.
I plan to explore this issue further with legal counsel to determine the appropriate course of action and to ensure that such discriminatory practices are addressed and rectified.
---
This information is just the beginning of the incident, and much more transpired in the subsequent months.
I am seeking legal advice and representation to address these issues and to explore potential legal actions against ACRCD and the involved parties.
Given the complexity and potential severity of these allegations, I believe your expertise in employment law, contract law, or civil litigation would be invaluable in navigating this case.
I am prepared to provide all relevant documents, evidence, and a comprehensive account of the events for your review.
I appreciate your consideration of my request and look forward to the possibility of working with you to seek justice and resolution in this matter.
Sincerely,
PART 2:
In my ongoing situation with the Alameda County Resource Conservation District (ACRCD), Colleen Hotchkiss, and other key individuals, I've come to understand that several legal terms and concepts are pertinent:
1. Collusion: It seems there might have been a secret agreement or cooperation among certain parties, including Colleen Hotchkiss and advisory board members like Sri Sethuratnam and Jim Leap. Their coordination to build a case against me appears rooted in past incidents and personal vendettas, potentially amounting to collusion.
2. Retaliation: I believe that some actions taken against me were in response to previous disputes. These actions, I feel, are retaliatory since my current contract was supposed to be separate from these past issues.
3. Breach of Contract: The reasons given for the non-renewal of my farming license don't align with the terms of my year-to-year contract. This discrepancy leads me to suspect a breach of contract.
4. Defamation: There have been instances of false or misleading information being spread about my farming practices, which has damaged my reputation. This, I believe, could be considered defamation.
5. Discrimination: If any actions against me were motivated by personal characteristics like race or gender, this would clearly be discriminatory.
6. Tortious Interference: It seems there was a deliberate attempt to disrupt my farming operations and my relationship with ACRCD and SFPUC, which might be classed as tortious interference.
7. Abuse of Power/Authority: Some individuals in positions of power within ACRCD and the advisory board may have misused their authority to negatively impact my farming practice, which could amount to an abuse of power.
8. Conspiracy: The coordinated efforts to fabricate or exaggerate claims against me suggest a possible conspiracy.
FURTHER:
Discrimination on the Basis of Disability: Unfair or prejudicial treatment directed towards an individual because of their disability or medical condition.
In many jurisdictions, such actions are illegal, especially in the workplace or in contractual agreements, under laws designed to protect individuals with disabilities.
If the retaliatory actions were specifically after knowledge of my medical condition or due to it and this was used to justify a violation or adverse action, it could potentially be a violation of laws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in the United States, or similar legislation in other countries, which prohibit discrimination based on disability.
This could also overlap with other legal concepts such as harassment, hostile work environment, or retaliatory discrimination.
---
PART 3:
Based on my situation with the Alameda County Resource Conservation District (ACRCD) and the actions of specific individuals, here are the possible pertinent legal terms that might apply:
1. Collusion: Secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy, especially in order to cheat or deceive others.
2. Retaliation: Punitive actions taken against someone for exercising a legal right, such as filing a complaint.
3. Breach of Contract: Violation of any of the agreed-upon terms and conditions of a binding contract.
4. Defamation: The act of damaging the good reputation of someone through slander or libel.
5. Discrimination: Unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people, particularly on the grounds of race, age, or sex.
6. Tortious Interference: Intentional damage to the plaintiff's contractual or other business relationships.
7. Abuse of Power: The misuse of authority for harmful, unethical, or illegal ends.
8. Conspiracy: A secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.
9. Constructive Dismissal (if applicable): When an employee resigns due to the employer's behavior being so intolerable or harmful that the employee cannot reasonably stay.
10. Hostile Work Environment: A form of harassment characterized by an environment that hinders one's ability to work due to the behavior of others, often involving discrimination.
11. Procedural Unfairness: A lack of fairness in the processes that lead to a decision.
12. Discrimination on the Basis of Disability: The legal term that might apply to a situation where someone is attacked or targeted due to their medical condition, and this condition is used as a basis for crafting the letter of violation.
Legal advice would be essential to determine which of these apply to my situation and how they could be addressed in potential legal action.
---
